Manuscript Triage
The purpose of this page is to impose narrative discipline before manuscript drafting begins.
Paper Types
| Paper type | Core question | What must be true | Common failure mode |
|---|---|---|---|
| Discovery paper | What new biological principle has been uncovered? | The paper can be summarized in one sentence without reference to tool building. | Too many side narratives dilute the main causal claim. |
| Technology paper | What new viral engineering capability has been created? | The capability is clearly new and not merely a better use of an existing method. | The draft spends more time on biology than on proving the capability. |
| Platform paper | What delivery problem is solved or meaningfully advanced? | Benchmarking, payload logic, tropism, or safety data make the practical advance hard to dismiss. | The study reads like a technical demonstration without a deployment argument. |
| Translational paper | What human-relevant disease or therapeutic path is unlocked? | The system is shown in a context editors can recognize as clinically meaningful. | The work never escapes proof of concept. |
Internal Rules
- Every project should have a one-sentence thesis before drafting begins.
- Every manuscript should declare its likely journal class before figures are finalized.
- Every paper should identify one modern anchor dataset or validation axis that makes the story feel complete for its intended venue.
- miRNA logic should usually be presented as enabling circuitry unless the paper is specifically about the logic itself.
Atlas Integration
Each project page should eventually include a Manuscript Triage section specifying:
- likely paper type;
- one-sentence thesis;
- primary figure logic;
- required validation axis;
- likely journal class;
- narrative risks.